-
Recent Posts
Archives
Categories
Change processes are well researched and documented but I wanted to explore my own experience with significant change in the context of my teaching practice. I started my career five years before the start of the Pokemon craze, but the idea of evolutions (though far less dramatic) seem suitable for describing professional growth.
I began my career in a departmentalized junior high model where cooperative learning was de rigueur. I myself experienced that model as a junior high student so it was familiar and comfortable.
Fast forward a decade and I find myself in a real, honest-to-goodness middle school complete with home rooms, goal setting, portfolios, self assessments, student-written report cards, and student-led conferences. Philosophically and practically this was a tremendously different teaching space than I had ever experienced before. Despite my 10 years experience, I felt like a novice again. The way I taught did not fit with the assessment methods used at this school.
Staff at the school were very passionate, knowledgable, and shared a core philosophy that guided practice but still gave room for individual processes. Thus began a period of radical change.
I began simply by using the forms other people used. I adopted their assessment scales. Students kept finished work in folders and identified them as best, most challenging, hardest, etc. I started the process as a mimic dressed up like a middle years teacher and acting the part, I then sought to understand the purpose for each strategy.
The importance of this stage is simply engaging in the process. Trying things out gave me the vocabulary and experience to know what questions I should even be asking. By the end of the year I was reasonably confident with the process, had aligned my planning and organization to fit with this style of assessment. I evolved from mimic to practitioner.
A few assessment cycles later, I felt comfortable enough to start adapting others’ assessment material to suit my own situation. I knew the rationale for each phase of the assessment cycle, and had an ever-growing understanding of the philosophical underpinnings upon which it was built. My own created tools gave me a context for further exploration of those ideas and I continued to experiment. This is the evolution from practitioner to innovator.
Now, another decade later, I work with others helping them to understand the reason behind the method, the philosophy driving the process. Working with teacher candidates allows me to spend time each day reflecting and articulating my knowledge illuminating the process for the student, and deepening my own understanding at the same time. Evolve: innovator to mentor.
Mentoring is not the final stop - there is always more to learn and new innovations can influence our thinking and practice. Committing to a philosophy is not an exclusive practice by which we dismiss other modes of thought, rather it is a measure by which we evaluate new processes. Philosophies themselves are subject to evolution in the early days of their formation. Through reflection and testing it is molded in increasingly subtle ways becoming more complete. I love new ideas, methods and practice; considering how it fits with my own philosophy and how it may inform my practice, influence my understanding, or even shape my philosophy. With each encounter comes the opportunity to reflect and grow.
On an education related discussion board, someone asked for advice on how to increase their marketability as an already-qualified, but unemployed teacher. The poster asked about pursuing further qualifications at a university. Here is a portion of the surprising discussion that followed between me and another responder with very different opinions:
Me: Consider your web presence and online footprint. Set up a Twitter account following and engaging with other teaching professionals. Create a professional blog in which you reflect on teaching and learning and share experiences and resources. Volunteer to deliver some PD sessions on something you’re good at for local teacher associations. Leave comments on other professional blogs providing feedback and asking questions. Join a national professional organization like (in your case) he National Council for the Social Studies so you get their journals and have access to the most current research. This kind of engagement with the profession speaks louder, in my opinion, than a few extra courses. Harder to do, maybe, but more valued – shows an ongoing and deep committment to the profession and developing your skills as an educator.
Him: If you applied to my school and an item on your resume shows that you are an educational blogger, or that you have x number of followers on twitter, I would politely ask you to leave my office. Hiring committees are far more interested in the fact that you have the appropriate qualifications than what your perceived commitment to the education community.
http://www.reddit.com/r/Teachers/comments/t39ts/need_guidance_on_making_a_decision_possibly/
From my point of view, blogs and twitter provide evidence of one’s philosophy, engagement with the profession, depth of understanding and growth over time. Certainly it can work against an applicant in the absence of professional discretion. In such cases it still helps a hiring committee with their decision making.
By virtue of the fact that I am blogging about this issue and sharing the post on Twitter, my point of view is clear. Fortunately I am in a progressive school district at a school with a well-established and deep respect for professional learning and innovation. My resume will now prominently display a QR code to my blog address right beside my twitter name to ensure I am asked to leave such an office. Best for everyone.
Certainly nothing is black and white, and this isn’t an “either or” issue, but maybe I’m wrong. What do you think is more critical to employability: advanced degrees? or miminum qualifications and active engagement with the profession? If you were on a hiring committee, would educational use of social media be an asset, or would it raise more concerns? How does professional development in informal social media compared to formal classes seen in terms of authenticity, rigor, applicability?
“Do you believe everything you tweet?”
I was taken aback. Mentally searching the latest batch of tweets I scanned for something that may have precipitated such a question. We talked briefly about the purpose of my tweets and engagement with the professional learning community. I had retweeted the lamentation of a colleague struggling to find a balance between work and home life. To a new tweep, it appeared the problem was mine and that I was in a period of stress.
It made me think more about how tweets contribute to people’s understanding of me and reinforced the importance of care in exercising my voice
My tweets generally come in four flavours:
Although there’s no hard and fast rule for how I identify each type of tweet, there are some patterns:
Sharing information and raising controversial topics within the 140 character constraints of a twitter post is not impossible. Doing so in a way that makes clear one’s own point of view or opinion is also possible.
Are all my tweets statements of my own personal beliefs and values? If I have taken care to craft the tweet appropriately, yes, each one should reflect who I am and what I believe.
Of course this need not be an either/or decision. E-readers are valuable addition to a school’s library and tablets can shared successfully among many students.
In a limited budget, would you rather have an e-reader for each student, or a tablet for every 8 students? Would you get some of each? Is it better to have one type of device in terms of training and maintenance? Do students care more for devices when they have their own? Is there greater buy-in with greater access? Is there value in experiencing a variety of learning platforms?
Feel free to share your reasoning for the comments.
Would you rather have a(n)
Total Voters: 5
I began my teaching career 1991 in a remote school accessible only by air. I was full of optimism and a belief in the transformative power of education. Believing that I was the agent of change and that the world was just waiting for me, I set out to bring hope and a brighter future to my new community. Then the first day of school came and reality set in.
While I found it very stressful at the time I find myself nostalgic about it now. Even though this experience took place so long ago it continues manifest itself in my life and career. Enough time has also passed to allow the real meaning and impact of that experience to come to the fore. I wrote this poem in the fall of 2007 attempting further to distill that experience.
It’s purpose is to communicate my disconnect with my new community, explore the impact of harsh daily experience, and illuminate my own personal transformation with the community itself as an Agent of Change acting on me. I went there to change, and was, rather, changed myself.
Up North
I
Manitoba is a prairie province,
infinite fields of golden grain,
and grazing livestock.
Or so they claim.But a thousand feet in the air,
flying straight North out of Winnipeg,
more than 2 hours have passed since patchwork sections
of black and gold gave way to lakes and trees,and only the occasional smudge of civilization.
Beside me the pilot points ahead;
his lips are moving.
I understand him to say, “There it is.”
over the roar of the twin engines.We circle around,
land on an impossibly short stretch of gravel,
taxi our way to a small brown building,
with a green sign declaring location and elevationDisembarking seems pretentious,
so I just get out and walk to the airport building.
The few people in the room watch me enter.
I hear a few words in Cree and then everyone laughs.I try to smile my way into the group
like I understand, but it’s obvious I don’t.
It never occurred to me that this job also required
a change in status to “minority”Waiting for my cargo, I look at the map on the wall.
“Here” being obliterated by the touch of a thousand fingers
The surrounding area stained brown
By the poor aim of a thousand moreA voice comes from behind me, “You the teacher?”
“Yes, I am.” I smile and extend my hand.
He stares at it while he musters the will to
perform the chore of shaking it.“You got lots?” he asks. I point out the window,
“A couple suitcases, some boxes,”
we watch one of them fall from the plane and split open
ravens swoop in curious and hopeful“Truck’s out back.” he tells me
and walks away shaking his headThe pilot finishes shoving my stuff out on to the tarmac,
someone else kicks it into a pile under the plane.
As it taxis away my books and clothes blow like so many leaves
against the chain-link fence.I spend the next half hour re-collecting
McLelland and Stewart’s New Canadian Library
(Prairie Literature, mostly…) from amongst the rocks
and peel my briefs and boxers from the Jack PinesII
At the end of the dirty snow-packed road is the school.
Beside it, my new home,
a two-story teacherage with a basement.
A rarity in this rocky landscape.Every night kids knock on the door
“can we visitchoo?” they run upstairs to the bathroom
and turn on the hot water before I can answer
looking out the window they gasp, “We’re high up… do you jump it?”They laugh at the hair on my arms
“You’re furry… you have fur!”
They drink cup after cup of sugar and milk,
warmed with a splash of teaMy radio is tuned to the local band station,
there are no others.
The one location in all creation
Where CBC isn’tThey broadcast bingo numbers
and personal messages
O 58, B skinny legs
Frank go home, supper’s readyOne day somebody put a Weird Al song on repeat
Locked the door. Took the key.
Couple of days later somebody finally busted in and changed the song
Maybe it was the first somebody, tired of his own prank.On the way I see my neighbour at the water pump
driving a ball of duct tape with snow machine parts stuck to it.
Behind on the sled is a 40-gallon barrel he fills with water
behind it a few armloads of split pine.He’ll have hot water too
once he chips through the skin of ice
Fills the pot, Starts the fire
And waits for it to boil.III
Twenty-eight kids in my class. Grade 9 and 10.
The youngest is 14, the oldest 21.
Only half of them are ever here
Different half every day. Sometimes more, sometimes less.School bus is a mini van and the back of a pickup
Kids spill out and over the edge and run inside
Forty below; they all love the bathroom
love holding their hands under the hot running water.There’s no gym so we push aside the desks
and play soccer in the classroom
Tupper and Mulroney for goal posts on one side
Hydrogen and Helium on the otherI hassle my student to come every day
Give them certificates for perfect attendance,
and heck when they play hooky,
Remind them how important school is.Prepositions, Viscosity, Pythagoras
Can’t get a good job without them, I proclaim.
I take their silence as tacit agreement
They don’t need to say anything to agree with meAnd they don’t.
One Friday in November we hand-deliver report cards
through the bush on the back of a snow machine
“Don’t knock,” we’re told, “just walk in.”
They expect it. They just don’t expect me.I’d composed a small missive on attending school
Backed my assertions with research
And prepared to deliver it 28 times.
I’d convince everyone to attend every day.Jenny’s house was first. Only there 6 days last month.
I see her crouching at the snowy lake bank behind the house
A bunch of young kids running around her,
She yells at them and shoos them away, still crouching.I call out, “your mom home?”
Without turning she shrugs an I-don’t-know at me.She wasn’t. No one was.
Just that 14 year old out back with a dozen toddlers
I leave the report card amongst the debris on the kitchen table
And head back out through the snow to where the children are.Jenny had chopped a hole in the ice with an axe
was scrubbing clothes with a bar of soap against a large rock
rinsed them in the frozen water
hung them to dry on the trees.Monday we had tea in class
and took an extra long bathroom break© Miles MacFarlane 11-2007
In 1990 my octogenarian philosophy of education professor, Sister M. with great grandiosity and a dramatic flourish informed the class that we will eventually “get our own classrooms, shut the door, and be Monarchs of all we survey, for that is the nature of Teaching.” To us, at the time, it sounded great – I’m the boss, I’m in charge, I’m in control, I’m the one that gets to run the show, I’m the font of knowledge, initiator of change, the academic revolutionary.
I didn’t know at the time, but she was quoting William Cowper’s poem, “The Solitude of Alexander Selkirk”. Selkirk was marooned on an island alone for four years. As sole inhabitant, he proclaims his dominion over land and creatures, but decries the misery of his isolation.
Wow. I don’t know if that’s the message Sister M intended, but that interpretation more accurately reflects the experience of teaching.
That teaching can be an isolating enterprise is no secret. The Atlantic reported only 3% of a teacher’s day is spent collaborating. That amounts to just over 10 minutes in an instructional day (I’ll bet that it wasn’t even 10 consecutive minutes). How, then, do we learn about best practice? When do we get to see exemplary teachers and dynamic classrooms in action? How often do we get to observe, share, learn, reflect, and grow our own capacity as professional teachers?
Save for a handful of PD days throughout the year, teachers have precious little time to engage in deep, meaningful, and productive conversation about our professional practice. Even then, PD days are filled with keynotes, and structured breakout sessions and free time is limited and segmented. A half hour over cinnamon buns and coffee before and an hour for lunch is all there may be.
Ninety minutes free engagement during a conference like this is as much time as teachers have during a two-week period. Proportionally, a full instructional day spent collaborating with groups of teachers is as much time as a month and a half worth of daily collaboration. Extended conversation with colleagues is the difference between simply knowing what someone else is doing and understanding how and why they are doing it. It is even enough time to process possible implementation and real cooperation between classrooms.
Recent grassroots innovations in professional development are changing the model for how teachers pursue PD. TeachMeets use two or seven minute presentations on whatever topic the presenter chooses. It’s rather like listening to an extended detailed version of a conference catalogue with the same depth and breadth of topics but much more interesting and inspirational. EdCamps encourage deeper, more interactive engagement providing space and time for participants to talk. Issues are debated, strategies shared, problems addressed, understanding extended, connections made, and initiatives initiated
.
As teachers break down the figurative barriers between their classrooms and find new ways to connect and collaborate we may mourn the loss of our sole monarchy, but need no longer decry our isolation.
Back in 2002, I was chairperson of our association’s professional development committee and had the opportunity to thank Mr. Kohn for his keynote for our divisional PD conference. I fear I was too nervous at the time to properly thank him, as I was too focused on the question I was going to ask to wrap up the morning conference. So, thanks again, Alfie, for the thought provoking keynote, and for providing the context for the most important question I’ve ever asked.
If you’re really committed to eliminating the sage on the stage, give up the stage. Stick some student desks right up front against the whiteboard, see what happens. I did, it is quite interesting.
This past September I viewed the following video. It made me think about how this rectangular space of ours could work differently.
Then we received 20 refurbished laptops from Computers for Schools. Access to electric outlets necessitated some innovative desk arrangements; as a result, I placed tables right up against the whiteboards. We watched the gamestorming video together and talked about how they could use their new space. I did reserve a chunk of the board for our Mimeo, but the rest of the boards and wall space I gave to the students. Each group has a chunk of wall upon which they can post, think, draw, brainstorm, display, think, debate, argue, store, and share.
What was originally a way to get computers closer to outlets contributed more than I expected to interactions in my classroom.
Do you think that simply re-arranging desks change the way you teach? Does physical space shape our approach to teaching and learning? Would love to hear some experiences and reactions to this.
This post is far more academic than any of my others, so reader, be warned. (cross-posted to http://teacherdad.com)
While studying my B. A. at the University of Manitoba in the mid to late 80′s, I fell in love with Canadian Literature (CanLit). Courses with David Arnason and Dennis Cooley, encounters with Robert Kroetsch, and had the opportunity to hear Timothy Findley, W. P. Kinsella, Kristjana Gunnars… ok, I’ll stop name dropping now. I was particularly enamored with prairie lit and, through it, developed a tremendous respect for my own ancestors who settled here more than a century earlier. The sense of place, the character of the land, struggles to carve out a life in these wild but fertile spaces caught my imagination.
Research of settings in children’s literature (KidLit) reveal a trend away from natural to constructed spaces; stories take place in and explore more urban settings, or have plot lines in which setting is secondary or unrelated to the main action.
“Natural environments have all but disappeared,” wrote University of Nebraska-Lincoln sociology professor emeritus J. Allen Williams Jr., and colleagues, reporting their findings in the journal Sociological Inquiry. The books they assessed were all winners or honor recipients of the prestigious Caldecott Medal for children’s books.
world-science.net
While the sample is relatively limited, the time span is great (>80 years), and the percent change is less than 10%, it points to issues worth exploring. How does KidLit influence a child’s world view? Does exposure to natural spaces affect individual senses of environmental stewardship? These questions speak to KidLit’s role as communicator of larger community and world values.
Root & Kiefer point to the influences of 18th century thinkers and philosophers for the start of,
a transition from the deliberate use of purely didactic literature to inculcate moral, spiritual, and ethical values in children to the provision of literature to entertain and inform
Children’s Literature – History, Literature in the Lives of Children, Environment, Awards
Like adults, children show preferences for natural settings and report that nature offers restoration and relief from stress (e.g., Korpela, 2002; Simmons, 1994; Wells & Evans, 2003).
teachgreenpsych.com
I’m not one to cry wolf, nor am I a Luddite standing in the way of progress. I even stopped decrying the evolving nature of language recognizing that it has always changed, and that understanding, while facilitated by convention, need not be limited by it. Nevertheless, it concerns me that children are not experiencing nature in the wild, as it were. In the spirit of The Story of Stuff, we must understand the impact of human action and consumption on our host planet.
I know it’s a big leap to make: urbanizing settings in a few dozen children’s books to the demise of the human species, but it is a conversation worth having. Where do children get their nature fix? How can children’s literature fill that gap? Should this understanding be reflected in school reading lists? Lots of questions, few answers.
At home with The Boy, we are fortunate to live in a rural-ish area with a mini forest and lots of space to roam and explore. I will, though, be more thoughtful about including nature-oriented stories more frequently.